As many of you know the infamous motion that was filed by the defense demanding that Judge Strickland recuse himself from the case based on an alleged relationship with a blogger, alleged statements, only one of which do we know if he really made, and it was not made in bias, but in calling it as he saw it. The other seems to be completely bogus as the defense has put off tentative trial dates that some have already come and gone. The other complaint was that the Judge filed a complaint with the Florida Bar based on the testimony of a PI that said attorney never paid for his services, which was the duty of the Judge as an officer of the court if he saw and believed there was apparent misconduct by said attorney, who’s been pretty good at getting away with his misconduct with the Florida Bar, as they have given him a few passes on some really bad behavior. The problem with the motion is that the new attorney, Mr. Cheney Mason, notarized documents in said motion with an expired stamp. While the media picked up on it after the bloggers did, it was put out there and they have refiled. Check it out:
Well, I guess they mean business. I still say there should be an investigation into this mess. As far as the Bar complaint that is BS and Baez hasn’t a leg to stand on on that one. The Judge did not target him, nor has he ever treated him unfairly. I would have given Miss Anthony a much tougher sentence on the check fraud sentence. Most would have. Judge Strickland has bent over backwards to be fair to this bunch, and I truly hope he defends himself on this one, but if he recuses himself, here’s to hoping they get the toughest Judge on the bench, that will not put up with the foolishness.